Southern New Hampshire University BUS 206 1-2 Video Case Study Q&A
PART ONE
1) Who did the plaintiff (Miss Morgan) bring to court to sue?
Answer: Internet dating service
2) The defendant offers which piece of evidence to show that if the plaintiff were unhappy, she should
have taken action?
Answer: Money-back guarantee
3) Which of the following describes the reasons the plaintiff believe the dating service was fraudulent?
Answer: I only (The owner paid one of his family members to go on the site)
4) The judge is concerned about potential fraudulent action of the owner of the dating service. To try to
understand whether fraud actually occurred, the judge begins to question the defendant. What
questions does she ask him to determine whether his actions were fraudulent?
Answer: Did you input customer profiles?
5) When questioned by the judge, which further piece of evidence does Miss Morgan give to the judge
to consider whether fraud occurred?
Answer: Defendant knowingly deceived
PART TWO
1) Why does the judge rule that the defendant is not guilty of fraud?
Answer: I and III (His website stated he did not screen clients. The defendant had a 30-day